3/30/2023 0 Comments Older version of cryptocatOthers are trying to make a quick buck as cryptocurrency prices surge. Some NFT buyers are collectors and fans who show off what they have bought on social media or screens around their homes. The nascent market for these items reflects a notable, technologically savvy move by creators of digital content to connect financially with their audience and eliminate middlemen. But digital media has not had the same value because it can be easily copied, shared and stolen. People have long attached emotional and aesthetic value to physical goods, like fine art or baseball cards, and have been willing to pay a lot of money for them. This month, the actress Lindsay Lohan sold an image of her face for over $17,000 and, in a nod to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, declared, “I believe in a world which is financially decentralized.” It was quickly resold for $57,000. Other digital tokens recently sold include a clip of LeBron James blocking a shot in a Lakers basketball game that went for $100,000 in January and a Twitter post by Mark Cuban, the investor and Dallas Mavericks owner, that went for $952. They’re buying bragging rights and the knowledge that their copy is the “authentic” one. I also applaud the fact that Cryptocat drives the effort for the first working multi-party OTR specification and that they are developing native Cryptocat applications for mobile, including iOS, Android, and BlackBerry.The sale was a new high point in a fast-growing market for ownership rights to digital art, ephemera and media called NFTs, or “ nonfungible tokens.” The buyers are usually not acquiring copyrights, trademarks or even the sole ownership of whatever it is they purchase. Privacy advocates should welcome these fundamental enhancements. According to Kobeissi, "We understand that the requirement of a username and password destroys the capacity to use Cryptocat to set up instant chat rooms, but we also believe that standardizing Cryptocat into an XMPP client is worth it." The industry standard OTR protocol was chosen for its security and interoperability with other XMPP clients, such as Pidgin and Adium. The Cryptocat 2 beta release will deploy transparently as an XMPP client with Off-the-Record Messaging (OTR) encryption protocol requiring username and password at log in (although it's not clear yet if XMPP account will be retained on server). This existing vulnerability was the driving factor behind the above modifications as browser-based crypto is not seen as sufficient protection from determined State-level actors. Also, client-side JavaScript encryption has its limitations since it would still be susceptible to a server-side code poisoning attack executed either through a man-in-the-middle attack or the service provider acting maliciously or subject to jurisdictional court order. They have also cautioned chat users about potential threats to the web-based version. Although they do offer a Tor hidden service at xdtfje3c46d2dnjd.onion for anonymization. The Cryptocat Project has always stated that, with its encrypted instant messaging, it does not protect you against hardware or software keyloggers and that it does not anonymize you by default. With this increased scrutiny comes a renewed focus on overall security as Cryptocat continues to move beyond experimental phase. border in June of this year, the Cryptocat application has been more publicly visible. Since the temporary detainment of Kobeissi at the U.S. But does that introduce too much complexity for the average web surfer? What good are cryptography and security tools if they're not used? At the far end of the security spectrum, end users ideally would verify original download against hashes that were published or distributed in offline fashion. Today, there is no total solution - only the striking of a satisfactory balance. The existing presumption, correct or not, is that original downloads occur in a relatively safer network environment than recurring usage. But herein lies the heart of the problem, because the entire web security architecture rests upon the integrity of the embedded SSL certificate authority (CA) system. This is a positive step especially if the original extension download is from a known, trusted source and/or verified against a strong cryptographic hash function. Installing a Chrome or Firefox extension is a one-minute process in most cases and affords the user protection against a variety of threats. We understand that pushing this change strongly lowers immediate accessibility to those who don’t have the Chrome or Firefox extension installed, but we do believe that the security benefits outweigh the accessibility disadvantages in this case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |